Below is a custom rubric to be used as part of the evaluation of this portfolio. You can complete the rubric as a fillable form.
Jump to the table view to see all the criteria on a single page.
| Areas for Improvement | Standard Criteria | Examples of Excellence |
| Structure and Navigation: The ePortfolio has a clear title, intuitive navigation, and a functional, aesthetically pleasing design that facilitates easy exploration. | ||
| Introduction and Land Acknowledgment: The introduction clearly states the ePortfolio’s purpose, SMART goals, and intended audience, and includes a meaningful land acknowledgment. | ||
| SMART Goals: At least three SMART goals are articulated and serve as a foundation for the ePortfolio’s artifact selection. | ||
| Metaphor/Framework: A metaphor or conceptual framework is effectively used to structure the ePortfolio and connect various components. | ||
| Philosophy Statement: A personal philosophy statement is included, reflecting current thinking and development over time. | ||
| Artifacts and Reflection: A minimum of nine artifacts are included, with at least three per SMART goal, accompanied by reflective commentary that justifies their selection and relevance. At least one artifact demonstrates a translation of theoretical or research principles to practice (i.e. application). | ||
| Future Directions: The ePortfolio contains a “Future Directions” section that builds on reflections and outlines potential next steps in the learning journey. | ||
| Supporting Materials: Required supporting materials, including a video overview, assessment rubric, and analysis of feedback, are provided alongside the ePortfolio. | ||
| Use of Multimodal Tools: The ePortfolio creatively incorporates various educational technology tools. | ||
| Other Elements: Annotated references and other elements are included as appropriate to enrich the ePortfolio’s content and learning value. | ||
| Self-Reflection: Reflections are insightful, demonstrating self-assessment. They are interwoven and provide a coherent overall reflection of my learning experience. | ||
| Peer Reflection: Evidence is included that peer evaluation has been taken into account, and the portfolio adjusted in reaction. |